Yule Walker Estimation and simulation in Matlab

If a time series data is assumed to be following an Auto-Regressive (AR(N)) model of given form,

the natural tendency is to estimate the model parameters a₁,a₂,…,a_N.

Least squares method can be applied here to estimate the model parameters but the computations become cumbersome as the order N increases.

Fortunately, the AR model co-efficients can be solved for using Yule Walker Equations.

Yule-Walker Equations

Yule Walker equations relate auto-regressive model parameters to auto-covariance r_xx[k] of random process x[n]. It can be applied to find the AR(N) model parameters from a given time-series data x[n] that indeed can be assumed to be AR process (visually examining auto-correlation function (ACF) and partial auto-correlation function (PACF) may give clue on whether the data can be assumed as an AR or MA process with appropriate model order N).

Steps to find model parameters using Yule-Walker Equations:

• Given x[n], estimate auto-covariance of the process r_xx[k]
• Solve Yule Walker Equations to find a_k (k=0,1,…,N) and σ² from

To solve Yule-Walker equations, one has to know the model order. Although the Yule-Walker equations can be used to find the model parameters, it cannot give any insight into the model order N directly. Several methods exists to ascertain the model order.

• ACF and PACF Autocorrelation Function (ACF) and Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF) may give insight into the model order of the underlying process
• Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)^[1] It associates the number of model parameters and the goodness of fit. It also associates a penalty factor to avoid over-fitting (increasing model order always improves the fit – the fitting process has to be stopped somewhere)
• Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)^[2] Very similar to AIC
• Cross Validation^[3] The given time series is broken into subsets. One subset of data is taken at a time and model parameters estimated. The estimated model parameters are cross validated with data from the remaining subsets.

Deriving Yule-Walker Equations

A generic AR model

can be written in compact form as

Note that the scaling factor x[n] term is a₀=1

Multiplying (2) by x[n-l]

One can readily identify the auto-correlation and cross-correlation terms as

The next step is to compute the identified cross-correlation r_wx[l] term and relate it to the auto-correlation term r_xx[l-k]

The term x[n-l] can also be obtained from equation (1) as

Note that data and noise are always uncorrelated, therefore: x[n-k-l]w[n]=0. Also the auto-correlation of noise is zero at all lags except at lag 0 where its value is equal to σ² (remember the flat Power Spectral Density of white noise and its auto-correlation). These two properties are used in the following steps. Restricting the lags only to positive values and zero ,

Substituting (6) in (4),

Here there are two cases to be solved – l>0 and l=0
For l>0 case, equation (7) becomes,

Clue: notice the lower limit of the summation which changed from k=0 to k=1 .

Now, equation (8) can be written in matrix form

This is the Yule-Walker Equations which comprises of a set of N linear equations and N unknown parameters.

Representing equation (9) in a compact form

The solutions can be solved by

Once we solve for , equivalently a_k, – the model parameters, the noise variance σ² can be found by applying the estimated values of a_k in equation (7) by setting l=0

Matlab’s “aryule” efficiently solves the “Yule-Walker” equations using “Levinson Algorithm”^[4][5]

Simulation:

Let’s generate an AR(3) process and pretend that we do not anything about the model parameters. We will take this as input data to Yule-Walker and check if it can estimate the model parameters properly

Generating the data from the AR(3) process given above

a=[1  0.9   0.6 0.5]; %model parameters
x=filter(1,a,randn(1000,1)); %data generation with gaussian noise - 1000 samples
plot(x);
title('Sample data from AR(3) process');
xlabel('Sample index');
ylabel('Value');

Plot the periodogram (PSD plot) for reference. The PSD plots from the estimated model will be checked against this reference plot later.

figure(2);
periodogram(x); hold on; %plot the original frequency response of the data

Running the simulation for three model orders and checking which model order suits the best.

N=[2,3,4];

for i=1:3,
    [a,p] = aryule(x,N(i))
    [H,w]=freqz(sqrt(p),a);
    hp = plot(w/pi,20*log10(2*abs(H)/(2*pi))); %plotting in log scale
end
xlabel('Normalized frequency (\times \pi rad/sample)');
ylabel('One-sided PSD (dB/rad/sample)');
legend('PSD estimate of x','PSD of model output N=2','PSD of model output N=3','PSD of model output N=4');

The estimated model parameters and the noise variances computed by the Yule-Walker system are given below. It can be ascertained that the estimated parameters are approximately same as that of what is expected. See how the error decreases as the model order N increases. The optimum model order in this case is N=3 since the error has not changed significantly when increasing the order and also the model parameter a₄ of the AR(4) process is not-significantly different from zero.

Rate this article: Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.

References

[1] Akaike H. (1998) Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In: Parzen E., Tanabe K., Kitagawa G. (eds) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
[2] McQuarrie, A. D. R., and Tsai, C.-L., 1998. Regression and Time Series Model Selection. World Scientific.↗
[3] Arlot, Sylvain, and Alain Celisse. “A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection.” Statistics surveys 4 (2010): 40-79.
[4] J. Durbin.The fitting of time series in models.Review of the International Statistical Institute, 28:233-243, 1960
[5] G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, “Matrix Computations”, The Johns Hopkins University Press, third edition, 1996.↗

Related topics

[1]	An Introduction to Estimation Theory
[2]	Bias of an Estimator
[3]	Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimators (MVUE)
[4]	Maximum Likelihood Estimation
[5]	Maximum Likelihood Decoding
[6]	Probability and Random Process
[7]	Likelihood Function and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
[8]	Score, Fisher Information and Estimator Sensitivity
[9]	Introduction to Cramer Rao Lower Bound (CRLB)
[10]	Cramer Rao Lower Bound for Scalar Parameter Estimation
[11]	Applying Cramer Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) to find a Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator (MVUE)
[12]	Efficient Estimators and CRLB
[13]	Cramer Rao Lower Bound for Phase Estimation
[14]	Normalized CRLB - an alternate form of CRLB and its relation to estimator sensitivity
[15]	Cramer Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) for Vector Parameter Estimation
[16]	The Mean Square Error – Why do we use it for estimation problems
[17]	How to estimate unknown parameters using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
[18]	Essential Preliminary Matrix Algebra for Signal Processing
[19]	Why Cholesky Decomposition ? A sample case:
[20]	Tests for Positive Definiteness of a Matrix
[21]	Solving a Triangular Matrix using Forward & Backward Substitution
[22]	Cholesky Factorization - Matlab and Python
[23]	LTI system models for random signals – AR, MA and ARMA models
[24]	Comparing AR and ARMA model - minimization of squared error
[25]	Yule Walker Estimation
[26]	AutoCorrelation (Correlogram) and persistence – Time series analysis
[27]	Linear Models - Least Squares Estimator (LSE)
[28]	Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE)

Books by the author

Wireless Communication Systems in Matlab Second Edition(PDF) (180 votes, average: 3.62 out of 5) $14.99 – Add to Cart Checkout Added to cart	Digital Modulations using Python (PDF ebook) (134 votes, average: 3.56 out of 5) $14.99 – Add to Cart Checkout Added to cart	Digital Modulations using Matlab (PDF ebook) (136 votes, average: 3.63 out of 5) $14.99 – Add to Cart Checkout Added to cart
Hand-picked Best books on Communication Engineering Best books on Signal Processing