Comments on: Ergodic Capacity of SISO flat fading channel https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/ Signal Processing for Communication Systems Sat, 21 Nov 2020 02:47:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Mathuranathan https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-30321 Mon, 27 Feb 2017 02:49:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-30321 In reply to Herman.

I can’t spot any mistake. Please correct if I am wrong.

]]>
By: Herman https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-30319 Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:24:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-30319 Hi, is line 17 correct?

Thanks.

]]>
By: Mathuranathan https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-26814 Sun, 05 Oct 2014 15:19:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-26814 In reply to Prakash Singh.

Thanks for spotting the mistake in the code. Corrected !!!

]]>
By: Prakash Singh https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-26810 Sun, 05 Oct 2014 00:01:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-26810 In reply to Mathuranathan.

The Rayleigh channel should be as

h= sqrt(1/2)*((randn(1,1000) + 1i*randn(1,1000) ));

here N=1000 is not the taps as in case of frequency selective channel.
Its slow varying/quasi-static frequency flat channel with
1000 realizations of the single-tap channel over which the monte-carlo simulation has been performed.
Law of large number relates the time average and statistical average for large N.

]]>
By: Mathuranathan https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-26745 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:23:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-26745 In reply to NAVEEN SAINI.

Yes. The channel is assumed to be flat
Even for a quasi-static channel, the channel varies slowly over one block that it can be considered constant. Thus the above code is still valid

]]>
By: NAVEEN SAINI https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2014/09/ergodic-capacity-of-a-siso-system-over-a-rayleigh-fading-channel-simulation-in-matlab/#comment-26744 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:08:00 +0000 http://www.gaussianwaves.com/?p=7404#comment-26744 Hi this is nice post. i have small doubt Pl clear it.
As ‘h’ defined as

h= sqrt((randn(1,100).^2 + 1i*randn(1,100).^2 ));

Q(1) It shows channel is flat for 100 bits. Is it mean 100 taps?
and
Q(2) If channel is quasi static then what ‘h’ would be ?

]]>